Conversing Over the Gap: Viewpoints on Immigration and Culture
Introducing the Individuals
Steve, 64, Essex
Occupation: Former underwriter
Political history: Usually Conservative, apart from when he resided in “the socialist republic of south Hackney” and voted for the Social Democratic Party
Interesting fact: His specialty in underwriting was kidnap and ransom: People often claim that insurance is dull, but it’s far from it when you’re discussing rescuing people from the Korean peninsula because the North Koreans have opened the missile silos”
Eva, 25, the capital
Occupation: Psychology graduate
Political history: In her native land, New Zealand, she supported both progressive parties
Interesting fact: Eva has worked as a singer on ocean liners; her longest trip was half a year, which is a significant duration to be at sea
For starters
Eva: Steve seemed there to have a nice time, to be open
He: She came across as a very intelligent, articulate, pleasant person
She: I had a caprese salad, mushroom pasta, and a rich sweet treat, it was very good
The big beef
She: He was definitely on the side of immigration being curtailed. He believes that British people who are native to the area, including non-white white British, don’t have as much access to the essential services, because increasing numbers are arriving. Whereas I just disagree that the figures are that bad
He: I’m for qualified migrants, I have no desire to reside in a homogeneous, WASP country with tepid ale. But I believe that governments have exploited immigration to occupy positions they can’t get people to do without increasing salaries. Wages are kept low, so levies have to be kept low, so we are unable to improve services – spend more money on childcare, on schooling, on technology
She: I am not deeply informed of the EU referendum, because I was sixteen and not living here when it happened. He clarified it to me in a different perspective. He told me about EU labor migrants – people could arrive in the UK and only be paid the salary of the country they came from
Steve: The French president spent two years getting the EU to abolish the system; it was reformed in 2018. Before that, posted workers coming in were undercutting British workers. Under Gordon Brown, it was oil workers that were imported; later it’s been service industry, farms. She grasped that, because she’d worked on a passenger vessel and said she was earning significantly higher than international colleagues
Common ground
Steve: It would be ideal to have a alternative power, come off of oil. I don’t like pollution, I value fresh atmosphere, I appreciate rural areas. We found consensus on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of Norway?” Their energy revenues soared after Ukraine started, they allocated those funds to develop green infrastructure
She: So we’re dependent on their petroleum. You can see that’s not a good way to proceed. He was supportive of maintaining domestic drilling for the limited quantity we’ll need in the future. I partially concur with him. We’re still going to use planes. We both think we should be moving towards greener solutions, turbine fields and hydro
Dessert topics
Eva: We touched on Islamophobia, though we avoided labeling it. He seemed worried by extremism coming here – he did mention that a many individuals in Middle Eastern countries were extremist, which I felt was not fair. I think it’s discriminatory to make judgments based on religion
Steve: I hail from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to Whitechapel, and she said it had been gentrified. Obviously, I would say that: populated by professionals. But when I go down that local market, I look like a foreigner. People stare at me because it’s become very Muslim. She had a little look at me about that. I used the word segregated area. Eva’s got Eastern European roots – she objects to the term, to her it implies deprivation. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes their own.” I agreed to use a alternative term – maybe enclave?
She: I feel like Muslim people are really disproportionately shown in the media as engaging in misconduct. It appears a somewhat discriminatory, or prejudiced against foreigners
Conclusion
He: I think we separated amicably. We had a embrace at the station
Eva: We both said that we’d had a wonderful evening