🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."