🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I traditionally avoided heavy use of chance during my tabletop roleplaying games. My preference was for the plot and session development to be determined by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. Recently, I opted to change my approach, and I'm truly happy with the result.

The Inspiration: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known actual-play show showcases a DM who regularly calls for "luck rolls" from the adventurers. He does this by choosing a polyhedral and defining consequences tied to the roll. This is essentially no unlike using a pre-generated chart, these are devised on the spot when a player's action lacks a predetermined conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own table, mostly because it seemed engaging and presented a departure from my usual habits. The results were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated balance between preparation and spontaneity in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Session Moment

In a recent session, my party had survived a large-scale fight. Afterwards, a cleric character wondered if two beloved NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. In place of deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both would perish; on a 5-9, only one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The die came up a 4. This resulted in a incredibly emotional sequence where the adventurers found the remains of their friends, still united in their final moments. The party conducted a ceremony, which was uniquely powerful due to prior character interactions. In a concluding touch, I decided that the remains were strangely transformed, showing a spell-storing object. I rolled for, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the party lacked to solve another major quest obstacle. One just script these kinds of serendipitous moments.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This incident caused me to question if chance and thinking on your feet are actually the essence of D&D. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles need exercise. Groups reliably take delight in derailing the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to adapt swiftly and fabricate content in real-time.

Using similar mechanics is a fantastic way to develop these abilities without venturing too far outside your comfort zone. The key is to use them for low-stakes circumstances that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. To illustrate, I would avoid using it to decide if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. But, I could use it to figure out whether the party enter a room just in time to see a major incident occurs.

Enhancing Player Agency

This technique also works to maintain tension and cultivate the impression that the adventure is dynamic, shaping according to their choices immediately. It reduces the sense that they are merely actors in a rigidly planned script, thereby enhancing the collaborative nature of the game.

This philosophy has always been embedded in the game's DNA. The game's roots were reliant on encounter generators, which suited a game focused on dungeon crawling. While modern D&D often emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely nothing wrong with thorough preparation. However, equally valid nothing wrong with letting go and allowing the whim of chance to decide some things rather than you. Direction is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We need it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to give some up, in situations where doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of control. Embrace a little improvisation for smaller outcomes. The result could discover that the organic story beat is significantly more powerful than anything you could have pre-written on your own.