🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a fresh game mode titled Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough format but includes a few key adjustments:

• Each team has just eight real players, with the remaining made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by real players grant full XP, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, this mode delivers on its title: it's a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it gives more options for players seeking different methods to have fun with the game. However, if video games has shown one thing, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many BF6 fans are mad.

Community Reactions: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer real players. Avoid making the errors of your competitors," reads one reply to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are going with this title," and another details everything they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's very fun to warm up, human participants prevent it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and don't play this title 24/7. Let them find a middle ground," adds a different comment. One reply on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Criticisms and Player Feedback

All that said, there are valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it will make wait times more extended for different playlists because of the sheer number of options in the game already. Similarly, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Finally, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer complete rewards, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the system. Thus this new playlist feels like the community meeting them halfway, according to forum feedback. A different user describes this addition as the developers "making a mistake significantly, I had so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Be Made?

If the development team has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it's that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Tasks being too difficult were adjusted very quickly, as did the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, should analytics shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to make further modifications.