🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a draft bill that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about business sector influence with public health regulations. In recent weeks, global health authorities issued a warning that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be lowered to less than half “according to global recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the law is enacted.

The WHO actually suggests a caution must occupy at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of the Zambian branch states the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, noting that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which encompasses growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.